Communications
A Laughing Matter: Comedy鈥檚 Role in Social Change

After a long day of classes or work, catching up on news is often filtered through comedy. You鈥檝e got highly political commentary from late-night TV hosts Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers. Jimmy Kimmel can update you on health care deductibles. Trevor Noah gives clever, revealing insights on The Daily Show, and Samantha Bee hilariously skewers the patriarchal political establishment. But despite the onslaught of jokes, it鈥檚 possible we鈥檝e only scratched the surface鈥攐r started the opening monologue鈥攐f comedy鈥檚 influence on society.
Over the summer, Professor Caty Borum Chattoo and 麻豆破解版鈥檚 (CMSI) launched 鈥淭he Laughter Effect,鈥 a creative and research initiative that features a series of investigations about how comedy can play a role in social change. While there has been plenty of research on 鈥The Daily Show factor鈥 in politics and political engagement, Borum Chattoo is probing the untapped intersection of comedy and social justice.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 fully know what it looks like to examine social justice issues with really funny comedy,鈥 says Borum Chattoo, the CMSI director and an executive in residence at 麻豆破解版鈥檚 School of Communication. 鈥淲ith our work, we will not only synthesize the research and literature that鈥檚 published, but look very deeply at the creative process of comedians who work on social justice topics.鈥
The Gut Level
As part of 鈥淭he Laughter Effect,鈥 SOC will bring in comedy writer, showrunner, and performer Bethany Hall as a full-time comedian in residence next year, funded by an external fellowship with Atlantic Philanthropies. Hall is currently featured on truTV鈥檚 , and she was a character on 30 Rock. Borum Chattoo is also writing a book, along with co-author Lauren Feldman, called , which will be published by University of California Press.
鈥淭he Laughter Effect鈥 concept germinated about six years ago while Borum Chattoo was producing a TV series on eradicating poverty. In discussions with other producers, they started wondering if there was a better way to communicate with audiences. 鈥淲e thought, 鈥業s it possible that we鈥檙e telling the story of global poverty the same way over and over?鈥 Not just the producers, but all kinds of storytellers,鈥 she recalls. 鈥淭he films were long-form and explanatory. They may have had lovely production value, but you鈥檙e not going to watch them on a Friday night.鈥
They considered ways to reach more young people and other viewers outside the international development community. They turned to comedy, producing Stand Up Planet with Hasan Minhaj鈥攚ho鈥檚 now a correspondent on The Daily Show. For another research project, Borum Chattoo and Feldman to the funny documentary, Stand Up Planet, compared to a serious, explanatory documentary about the same topics.
鈥淧eople learned more about the global development issues by watching the traditional somber documentary, but they felt more watching Stand Up Planet,鈥 she says. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 meaningful, because if we want people to believe they鈥檙e agents of change, an emotional response is actually more important in getting people engaged.鈥
The Human Imperative
While this work isn鈥檛 exactly apolitical, Borum Chattoo doesn鈥檛 want it to be viewed through any partisan lens. When confronting issues like climate change or famine, a comedic style can connect with larger numbers of people of all political persuasions.
鈥淲hen we get traction on really important social justice topics, it鈥檚 not because one side agrees and the other side doesn鈥檛. It鈥檚 because we see the human imperative,鈥 she says.
She mentions the viral clip of Michelle Obama singing carpool karaoke with James Corden, a gregarious鈥攁nd nonpolitical鈥攖alk show host. During the segment, Obama spoke with Corden about her work for girls鈥 education. 鈥淭hat video was shared millions of times. That鈥檚 reaching so many more people than a policy issue brief about global girls鈥 education,鈥 Borum Chattoo explains.
Classes with Norman Lear
Before wading into comedy and social change through research, Borum Chattoo learned from a master. She spent about a decade in Hollywood working for producer Norman Lear. It鈥檚 hard to overstate his in shaping funny but socially progressive television. He helped introduce an indelible portrait of the white working class with All in the Family鈥檚 Archie Bunker; an early interracial couple on The Jeffersons; a pioneering transgender character on All That Glitters; strong, independent women in Maude and One Day at a Time; and a loving, working-class African-American family on Good Times.
鈥淚 benefited from watching a professional person who was able to accomplish so much, not only through comedy as an art form, but comedy dealing with social justice as an art form,鈥 she says.
In their book, Borum Chattoo and Feldman will examine why some comedy breaks through the fog and grabs your attention. She says there鈥檚 a paucity of research that analyzes differences between various mediums, such as sketch comedy, stand up, or satire. She also says comedy can鈥檛 overtly try to 鈥渕essage鈥 the audience.
鈥淔or comedy to be engaging around issues that matter, it has to be great comedy. It has to be great art,鈥 she notes.
Whose Line Is It Anyway?
This raises a frequent question from mission-driven nongovernmental organizations. Given that the best comedy is provocative by design, what if a comedian goes too far? Borum Chattoo remembers an illuminating discussion she had with high-level communications officials on this subject.
鈥淚 was pretty emphatic that if you鈥檙e going to meaningfully work with comedy, you have to let the comedy be funny. You have to give the comedian real creative freedom,鈥 she recalls. 鈥淎fter I finished the talk, the very first question was, 鈥楬ow do you know how to not cross a line?鈥 And I said, respectfully, 鈥榊ou鈥檙e already not doing it right, because that was your first question.鈥欌
Nonprofit groups worry about seeming blas茅 about life-and-death issues like human rights. Borum Chattoo remembers the challenge of explaining a comedy campaign to anti-poverty activists in India.
鈥淚 think it鈥檚 hard for serious NGOs to say to their boards, and their funders, 鈥榃e鈥檙e going to use comedy.鈥 But our point is that comedy is actually a serious strategy, and maybe we鈥檙e not taking it seriously enough.鈥